Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 05-08-2011 00:51:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I think we have to agree to disagree on this one. The corporate norm
> > of checks and balances is to have applications for expenditure, be it
> > for trivial sums or large capital items, to be signed off by
> > someone/some group with no interest in the outcome, so they can make
> > an objective decision.
> >
> > e.g. I can sign off travel and expenses for others but not for myself.
>
> At least in my experience, each division would receive its own budget
> with independent spending authority. This is subject to auditing but
> only in retrospect, not prior to the expense taking place.
Do you suggest the Council should have money to spend?
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
|
|
