1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:12:32PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
4 |
> Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer |
5 |
> has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
6 |
> Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the |
7 |
> Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote |
8 |
> twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks |
9 |
> a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having |
10 |
> devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision, |
11 |
> makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
12 |
|
13 |
It definitely does create a conflict of interest. |
14 |
|
15 |
I think there are a couple of ways to handle it: |
16 |
|
17 |
1) don't allow council members to be in devrel, or |
18 |
2) don't allow council members who are also in devrel to vote in |
19 |
appeals. |
20 |
|
21 |
What does everyone think? |
22 |
|
23 |
William |