Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/29/2012 10:09 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_920c6d6daafe7702bfa3b8a2bc21e0c1.xml
>> Can you indicate what the council has to vote on/decide for this one?
> EAPI=5
> optional: "$@" placement in default for src_configure()
> econf "$@"
> optional: "$@" placement in default for src_compile()
> emake "$@"
I still don't see the point of it. econf or emake could just be called
directly. We won't gain anything by allowing arguments, but only
complicate things.
> this one is what I'm really after for:
> default for src_install() in EAPI=5 should accept "$@" in correct place
> to avoid usage of EXTRA_EMAKE within ebuilds/eclasses and to avoid
> duplicating the Portage code for DOCS.
> NOTE: When this was last voted on for EAPI=3, we didn't have this DOCS
> handling, and this wasn't important yet.
> emake DESTDIR="${D}" "$@" install
Again, this could be called directly, which has the advantage that it
makes it obvious that src_install isn't the default.
Ulrich
|
|
