On 03-08-2011 11:09:07 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > 1. Include all commits, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog 
> > > messages
> > > 
> > > 2. Allow commit filtering, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog 
> > > messages
> > > 
> > > - Filters to allow: keywording, stabilization, removal of ebuilds. 
> > > Whoever implements the code can decide on the format of said filters.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Do any council members feel strongly that we should include additional 
> > > options, or is it good enough to just make a choice on these two?
> > 
> > I listed the questions I think are relevant at the bottom of my mail.  I
> > feel you forgot the most important one: should ChangeLogs be
> > auto-generated at all?.  Only if yes,
> 
> Yeah, that's already on my draft agenda [1]. =) But we should still have 
> a small set of options to choose from if we do vote to automate, so we 
> don't sit around for another month or discuss it aimlessly for hours. 
> Being prepared is what I'm hoping we can do here.

Ok, then I suggest simply adding ", don't bother about changes between
CVS log and ChangeLog" to both of your options.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level