| 1 |
On 16.07.2011 22:00, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15/07/2011 05:22 μμ, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 15.07.2011 15:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 20:39 Thu 14 Jul , Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 14.07.2011 20:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> On Thursday 14 of July 2011 20:13:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>>> Keeping a list and periodically going through it seems fine to me. Are |
| 8 |
>>>>>> you or someone else interested in joining devrel to get this implemented |
| 9 |
>>>>>> and maintained? The policy should probably be written as a GLEP and I |
| 10 |
>>>>>> can help with that but until GSoC is over I am pretty much fully booked |
| 11 |
>>>>>> for Gentoo time so I would like to avoid championing it at this point. |
| 12 |
>>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>>>> Regards, |
| 14 |
>>>>>> Petteri |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>> Not interested in joining devrel, sorry, but I could start writing the GLEP. |
| 17 |
>>>>> Is there an existing one about cloaks that we could improve, or start from |
| 18 |
>>>>> scratch? |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> I am not aware of any of the existing GLEPs covering the matter so from |
| 21 |
>>>> scratch is probably required. For the GLEP I think it's enough if we |
| 22 |
>>>> keep things simple and just list the conditions for getting and keeping |
| 23 |
>>>> each type of cloak and the process of getting requesting a cloak. |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> Why should this be a GLEP? Seems like it should be covered by either |
| 26 |
>>> devrel or userrel, no need for the council to get involved as it's not a |
| 27 |
>>> global issue. |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
>> I think cloaks are a project wide issue. If you think it's best for |
| 31 |
>> devrel to handle it on our own then I suggest we have a council vote |
| 32 |
>> saying that or I can try to get a GLEP for devrel done and include it in |
| 33 |
>> there for responsibilities. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
>> Regards, |
| 36 |
>> Petteri |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Are you sure this issue falls under the devrel's umbrella? Seems more |
| 39 |
> appropriate for userrel. Regarding the GLEP for devrel, are you talking |
| 40 |
> about this? |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Merging userrel to devrel has been my and Jorge's agenda for quite a |
| 44 |
while now. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/1112 |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> We can add it to our agenda as well |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Yes we could vote on that verbatim too but it would be more beneficial |
| 53 |
to do check if something should be changed while at it. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Regards, |
| 56 |
Petteri |
Archives