Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o, gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008]
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 21:28:06
Message-Id: 1210886879.2615.0@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] by Donnie Berkholz
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2008.05.15 21:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
5 [snip]
6 >
7 > tove brought up an interesting point from GLEP 39:
8 >
9 > If any meeting has less than 50% attendance by council members, a
10 > new election for all places must be held within a month. The 'one
11 > year' is then reset from that point.
12 >
13 > musikc questioned whether that was only intended for the regular
14 > meetings or also irregular ones like this.
15 >
16 > Open up the floodgates, folks. What do you think, what should we do?
17 > I look forward to hearing your advice.
18 >
19 > Thanks,
20 > Donnie
21 > --
22 > gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list
23 >
24 Donnie,
25
26 The council have met monthly as required by the GLEP. This meeting is
27 single topic about policy, it neither requires to be in public, nor
28 does it require anyone other than -council. A closed session or emails
29 or teleconference would be quite in order for determining and agreeing
30 policy.
31
32 Forcing an election over this issue, is in effect, a vote of no
33 confidence in our council
34
35 Delaying the policy setting for three months, until a new council is
36 elected (1 month nominations, 1 month elections, a few weeks for admin)
37 is not in the best interests of Gentoo, nor those whose appeals will be
38 delayed.
39
40 While the present council would remain in office until replaced, they
41 could hardly make a ruling on the very issue that forced the vote of no
42 confidence.
43
44 An election now, over this, is just silly.
45
46 - --
47 Regards,
48
49 Roy Bamford
50 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
51 gentoo-ops
52 forum-mods
53 treecleaners
54 trustees
55
56 For the avoidance of doubt, I'm writing as an individual developer, not
57 on behalf of any office or team I am a part of.
58 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
59 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
60
61 iEYEARECAAYFAkgsqt8ACgkQTE4/y7nJvasTCwCbBmfHQhQaKS+yh4EXtl5Z/FMw
62 2NYAoJ5pGK5DD6SjX36sZXE0czXJzdpG
63 =kC4P
64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
65
66 --
67 gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>