List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 12:50 Fri 05 Aug , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 05-08-2011 00:51:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > I think we have to agree to disagree on this one. The corporate norm
> > > of checks and balances is to have applications for expenditure, be it
> > > for trivial sums or large capital items, to be signed off by
> > > someone/some group with no interest in the outcome, so they can make
> > > an objective decision.
> > >
> > > e.g. I can sign off travel and expenses for others but not for myself.
> > At least in my experience, each division would receive its own budget
> > with independent spending authority. This is subject to auditing but
> > only in retrospect, not prior to the expense taking place.
> Do you suggest the Council should have money to spend?
No, we're just way out on a weird analogy limb here.
Council Member / Sr. Developer