1 |
Graham Murray wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> writes: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 21:22 Thu 05 Jun , Richard Freeman wrote: |
6 |
>>> Here is a thought - maybe the council would be more active if we only |
7 |
>>> put |
8 |
>>> half the slots up for election every other year. I think part of the |
9 |
>>> problem is that with the council starting off new every year it takes |
10 |
>>> some |
11 |
>>> time for them to get a sense for their actual power. 1/6th of their |
12 |
>>> meetings are either their first meeting or their last meeting - which |
13 |
>>> aren't going to be big get-stuff-done meetings. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> I agree with this. The lack of continuity is a major problem. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> So maybe the rules should be changed to make it more like the local |
18 |
> councils here in the UK. Each Councilor serves for more than one year |
19 |
> (typically 3 or 4) and so each year only a proportion of seats on the |
20 |
> council are up for election. |
21 |
|
22 |
I'd rather say that either the council people have to prepare themselves |
23 |
better for the meetings or there must be more meetings. |
24 |
This isn't politics but IT business. Changes are being made quickly and |
25 |
easily. We don't need long processes but short ones. Voting every year |
26 |
should encourage people to take that serious. |
27 |
|
28 |
Cheers, |
29 |
Tiziano |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |