List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 08/02/2011 07:24 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
> The trustees are legally accountable and responsible for the
> operation of the Gentoo Foundation Inc. Some things in the bylaws
> are there to comply with statutes.
> The Gentoo council has no legal standing whatsoever, which I have
> already said (at FOSEDEM) makes me a little nervous as a trustee,
> since the council makes decisions on behalf of Gentoo that the
> Foundation would be held both accountable and responsible for. There
> have been no issues with that, yet.
The council is supposed to discuss and decides on technical or project
wise issues. How can a technical decision violate laws etc? I can't
think on top of my head an issue that would expose Foundation. Can you
please provide an example?
> Maybe its time to reorganise Gentoo along standard corporate lines
> again, as it was before drobbins left. If we go in that direction,
> the council becomes a technical committee that is part of the
> Foundation. GLEP39 is no longer needed and the Foundation bylaws are
> amended to reflect the new structure.
If we go in that direction, I see no point in having the Foundation and
the Council as two separate entities. In this case it would make much
more sense to merge them. I don't quite like the idea though.
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----