| 1 |
On 14.08.2011 19:31, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2011.08.14 15:35, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 14.08.2011 17:19, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> What do you mean by control ? |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> My proposal is: |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Devrel: 1 year term. Developers are nominated by others or they |
| 10 |
>> can |
| 11 |
>>>> self-nominated |
| 12 |
>>> Why do devrel members need to be developers? |
| 13 |
>>> Users with the correct skill set can do the job just as well, if |
| 14 |
>> they |
| 15 |
>>> are interested. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> And when the users start to do the job they would become developers |
| 19 |
>> in the broader sense of the term (for example in many places on our |
| 20 |
>> web |
| 21 |
>> site Developer means anyone with @gentoo.org email). |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Regards, |
| 24 |
>> Petteri |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> As I understand your reply, it would be possible for a suitably |
| 28 |
> skilled user (no @gentoo.org) to become a member of devrel and for that |
| 29 |
> user to become a staff member of Gentoo as a result of joining devrel. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> i.e. there in no requirement to hold a @gentoo.org before getting |
| 32 |
> actively involved in devrel. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Correct. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Petteri |
Archives