| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 15/07/2011 05:22 μμ, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 15.07.2011 15:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 20:39 Thu 14 Jul , Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 14.07.2011 20:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> On Thursday 14 of July 2011 20:13:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>> Keeping a list and periodically going through it seems fine to me. Are |
| 10 |
>>>>> you or someone else interested in joining devrel to get this implemented |
| 11 |
>>>>> and maintained? The policy should probably be written as a GLEP and I |
| 12 |
>>>>> can help with that but until GSoC is over I am pretty much fully booked |
| 13 |
>>>>> for Gentoo time so I would like to avoid championing it at this point. |
| 14 |
>>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>> Regards, |
| 16 |
>>>>> Petteri |
| 17 |
>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> Not interested in joining devrel, sorry, but I could start writing the GLEP. |
| 19 |
>>>> Is there an existing one about cloaks that we could improve, or start from |
| 20 |
>>>> scratch? |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> I am not aware of any of the existing GLEPs covering the matter so from |
| 23 |
>>> scratch is probably required. For the GLEP I think it's enough if we |
| 24 |
>>> keep things simple and just list the conditions for getting and keeping |
| 25 |
>>> each type of cloak and the process of getting requesting a cloak. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Why should this be a GLEP? Seems like it should be covered by either |
| 28 |
>> devrel or userrel, no need for the council to get involved as it's not a |
| 29 |
>> global issue. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> I think cloaks are a project wide issue. If you think it's best for |
| 33 |
> devrel to handle it on our own then I suggest we have a council vote |
| 34 |
> saying that or I can try to get a GLEP for devrel done and include it in |
| 35 |
> there for responsibilities. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Regards, |
| 38 |
> Petteri |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
Are you sure this issue falls under the devrel's umbrella? Seems more |
| 41 |
appropriate for userrel. Regarding the GLEP for devrel, are you talking |
| 42 |
about this? |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/1112 |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
We can add it to our agenda as well |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
- -- |
| 49 |
Regards, |
| 50 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 51 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 52 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOId+2AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCcgIQALzTo5Jhoqwmg3Od0gu8v2aR |
| 55 |
hVsfLiHVVbG1uLmHl7/AdkU0mfs1wetqdmbbHcp8w7PEp5nGsm+j2Oshiv4HN1+b |
| 56 |
cxzYVFcJnJ2ujnbdkMmP+q6BFJMPs0Z/LW47k6l8epXHZtJxZossG7QwtMk9uCwJ |
| 57 |
gCWoh4INGdgPKfz8xweR6go6l+1LlRAqpT6ks7IHrz8butElihqQft5ftnolrnJ5 |
| 58 |
Nfpecebq3ETfZbwBn8hyYQRQYwE6Kj70PwemSxQhYhRxWalcoA53pyfVPiQF2GzO |
| 59 |
NohxFz7jHQf9xVT/3CDJniigx/dxijVbzGdTTO96Z1DKIjIKmO/vjvgUTEWySKsM |
| 60 |
RcgdJfu8c2xD9Gs2+nby9Vm8UG3L4PysAAQjNimyYlovtJy2A5cl60D8EN6gfvAJ |
| 61 |
pjprmYLovetkL0jvMsoA2KnffahrMhgrzm9n0J0D0ZRbTXFP11eiW3LEOa/3Hh2X |
| 62 |
LmRrLasHcHAGAvUsoUUH4jfrs1y5AuoW3AUKc3u3XV7vzxzmPIp7yN+ACxxwEMJo |
| 63 |
/BIo3U5nBQqoCUclPocpT1I+Ftpo7hzNzm/SDGX6msNT9fD6OTK3GwB1vxFlAQ9Y |
| 64 |
ut8ZB1x5KKi4jfUXAhrU/Ueo1Gtl050QsA1/Fp6QF2d5pXS3vFCX9hImSmyFkyK2 |
| 65 |
BLzQW7PKa0qqeaFInrie |
| 66 |
=VzJs |
| 67 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives