Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication]
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:42:07
Message-Id: 20070721074153.0591a5f5@zaphod.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication] by Kumba
1 On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:47:42 -0400, Kumba wrote:
2
3 > This is actually quite similar to some of the top-level MLs I'm on,
4 > namely linux-mips. It's designed so you can exclude the ML from a
5 > chain if you need to take a topic to private convo with a related
6 > party.
7
8 You can do that anyway, with Reply to Sender. Since the whole point of a
9 list like this is for open discussion, the default should be for replies
10 to go to the list. It is different for, say, an announce list. The other
11 Gentoo discussion lists have Reply-To set so omitting it from here seems
12 more like an omission than policy.
13
14
15 --
16 Neil Bothwick
17
18 An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will
19 eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure,
20 and has a lower TCO, than linux.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies