1 |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Hi. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Sometime ago after the issue of "slacking arches" was raised again at a |
9 |
> council meeting, I've started an internal discussion with Gentoo's arch |
10 |
> teams, to determine the current status of the arch teams and to check |
11 |
> how we could help improve it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I'm now quoting one email I've sent in the last round, hoping to start a |
14 |
> public discussion about two issues raised internally. |
15 |
> I'm bcc'ing the arch teams so they're aware of this new thread and to |
16 |
> give them a chance to chime in. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> - ------------- |
20 |
> |
21 |
> On 06-03-2011 14:40, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
22 |
> ... |
23 |
>> Please add a reply under each of the points you're interested. If you |
24 |
>> feel there's anything else I'm missing please add a reply about |
25 |
>> additional points. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> 7. General issues |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Seems I forgot a few general issues that were raised in the previous thread. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> * lack of man power and burn-out |
32 |
Use Bugzilla to track which stable requests have been tested OK by |
33 |
arch testers and send a weekly email report similar to the one Robin |
34 |
sends out for additions and removals. Maybe we can use Target |
35 |
Milestone: and add "Arch Tested X86" and so on. Most of my time is |
36 |
spent on finding which packages need testing and if I knew some have |
37 |
been tested good I could just move to the ones that need work. |
38 |
[snip] |
39 |
-- |
40 |
David Abbott (dabbott) |
41 |
Gentoo |
42 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/ |