1 |
El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:32 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Since there is no need to stay in the herd some prefixed time, I see no |
4 |
> > reason to allow developers to be in mail aliases without adding them to |
5 |
> > herds.xml, and this allows others to "easily" review herds.xml looking |
6 |
> > for empty herds. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> |
9 |
> >From what you've said, the mail alias should just be ignored when |
10 |
> reviewing herds. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It is possible that the people on the alias are simply curious and |
13 |
> have no intention of maintaining anything. I don't have a problem with |
14 |
> that. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
But we need to clearly state that, when a herd is empty in herds.xml we |
19 |
should consider their packages as orphan even if some devs are listed in |
20 |
the alias. |