Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-project@g.o
From: Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:01:34 +0200
Alec,


On 06/16/10 06:48, Alec Warner wrote:
>> When you are active in Gentoo during one week and less active during the
>> next it may happen that people (sometimes jokingly) call you a
>> "slacker".  This pattern seems to have become common enough that people
>> even started calling themselves slackers when they are less active than
>> potentially possible.  Is this reasonable and healthy?
>>
>> No, it isn't.
> 
> Why is it unhealthy?

I believe it's unhealthy because it's using guilt as a tool.

Also, it's inverting being a developer from doing something to not not
doing something: inverting being good to not being evil.  That's two
different things.

It's fine to me to beg people to fix certain things and remind them from
time to time.  Calling people slackers seems respectless to me, though.
 Everyone is free to do work on Gentoo or not: Gentoo is about choice.


> I would hesitate to make the assertion that every minute spent on
> Gentoo is a gift.  You are not counting the people who do not always
> have a positive impact on the community (see the other thread where
> you brought up CoC violations and other 'gifts' of community members.)

That's a difficult one: I would say it's a gift as long as intentions
are good from an ethic(?) point of view.


> Do you disagree with the policy that council members should attend the
> meetings?  If so why?  If not, what is wrong with the existing policy;
> the wording?

It would be good if they joined the meeting, yes.

I don't believe anyone needs to be burned or marked a slacker, though,
if he doesn't attend.  To me the remaining attendees should be able to
decide without him (unless quorum(?) has been rejected earlier).


> I am unsure what you are actually asking to change.  Are you aiming to
> change developer behavior?  Tools?  Processes?

I'm asking for a change in thinking and processes.

I hope to have made my point a bit more clear.

Best,



Sebastian


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
References:
Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
-- Alec Warner
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
Previous by date:
Re: Dev developer: Anthony G. (blueness) Basile
Next by date:
Re: Dev developer: Anthony G. (blueness) Basile


Updated Jun 27, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-project mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.