| 1 |
On 26-10-2011 18:49:27 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Ok, what's your rationale behind that? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at |
| 5 |
> some point, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Since the Council has discussed that for several meetings to reach a |
| 8 |
discussion, I don't think they are shortly going to change their minds. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> 2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up |
| 11 |
> changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message |
| 12 |
> to see what actually happened), |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Could be considered as a bad commit message. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> 3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Also this has been discussed and decided upon by the current and |
| 19 |
previous Councils, so also that opinion is unlikely to suddenly change. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 24 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives