-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/01/2011 08:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and who
>>> can't get a cloak?  This is probably going to be the GLEP that Petteri
>>> refers to.  Does it make sense to vote for this topic without that GLEP
>>> in place?
>>>
>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri
>> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility to
>> devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP defining the
>> devrel policy just like then one for QA.
> 
> Ok, thanks.
> Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote for transferring
> the cloak responsibility to devrel?
> 
> 
Yes I think this is pretty much the gist.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=W/1o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----