| 1 |
On Monday 05 December 2011 01:48:34 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/04/2011 10:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > all "failures" that don't result in an aborted build (e.g. EAPI=0 dodoc |
| 4 |
> > on missing file) will get "missed". many of those are logged as QA |
| 5 |
> > warnings, but it seems default --quiet-build=y will not include these in |
| 6 |
> > the log summary. this might be useful to fix -- i'll poke Zac about it |
| 7 |
> > if he doesn't see this e- mail. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This is due to the default PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="log warn error" in |
| 10 |
> make.globals. The developer profile sets |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> :PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="${PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES} qa", so anyone running |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> that profile gets the QA warnings automatically. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Maybe it would be fine to enable the QA warnings by default for all |
| 17 |
> users. I don't feel strongly either way. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
hrm. there's some QA messages i think we should have all our users see by |
| 20 |
default (so they'll report bugs), and there's some i think should be in the |
| 21 |
developer profiles. although, i think most are in the former category, so |
| 22 |
maybe we shouldn't sweat it for now ? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
specifically, i'm thinking of the build type warnings that we label as upstream |
| 25 |
should be shown to devs and not users ... |
| 26 |
-mike |
Archives