1 |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:31:03PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:18:17 Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
3 |
> > On 09/29/2011 12:09 PM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 29/09/11 16:11, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Otherwise some funny person will use a 4-bit key that expires tomorrow |
6 |
> > >> just to point out the missing details ... |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > That is a simple case of "don't be a jackass". |
9 |
> > > I do not feel that it is a productive use of my time to outlegislate |
10 |
> > > being a jackass in Gentoo. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > If I comment on this, I will be bikeshedding ... j/k. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I'd be happy just to see a policy in place saying "we reject unsigned |
15 |
> > manifests". I mention the Council because that's one avenue for gentoo |
16 |
> > wide policy. The other is a GLEP, but I don't think that's necessary |
17 |
> > here, or at least not yet. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> the commit hook is waiting on git: |
20 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/377233 |
21 |
> |
22 |
> then you won't need a policy because you can't commit any other way :p |
23 |
> -mike |
24 |
|
25 |
We don't need to wait for git which is forever on the horizon to enforce |
26 |
it. There are other solutions to use. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson |
30 |
Pseudonym: TitanOfOld |
31 |
Gentoo Developer |