| 1 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> Markos Chandras schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> All I am saying is that the change is there for more than 2 weeks. |
| 4 |
>> Imho it seems suboptimal (from user's experience perspective) to go |
| 5 |
>> back to the old behavior without causing extra frustration. |
| 6 |
> You can check the forums thread and poll for an indication how much |
| 7 |
> frustration this would create. Also the question is whether stabilizing |
| 8 |
> a quiet-build portage causes more frustration than reverting the change |
| 9 |
> in unstable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-901858.html |
| 12 |
> The poll has an unusually high number of respondents, maybe an |
| 13 |
> indication of how controversial that topic is. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Best regards, |
| 17 |
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I might also add, there have already been a couple people on the mailing |
| 22 |
lists wanting it back to the old way and thinking something in portage |
| 23 |
got broken. Once it hits stable, there will likely be a lot of those |
| 24 |
threads both on the mailing lists and forums. I actually added the |
| 25 |
option to my sig hoping people will see it and not have to ask. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I know there is plans for a news item but I have to also wonder if |
| 28 |
people are going to read and actually realize what the change was. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Dale |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
:-) :-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 38 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives