| 1 |
Dominik Riva wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Jan 15, 2008 11:06 AM, George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dominik Riva wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > If you have a better idea for a forum to post this in, I am all ears. |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> > Regards, Dominik Riva |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> Depends what you want to see. If you want to see your thread locked and |
| 9 |
>> no developers answering then post it on the forum, if you want to be |
| 10 |
>> told you're stupid and to post it somewhere else then post to gentoo-dev. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> You're a bit out of luck because most developers (not all) only tend to |
| 13 |
>> read their own herd/package/arch lists, -core and sometimes -dev, not |
| 14 |
>> for any reason but they want to develop and not get mixed up in this |
| 15 |
>> type of mess, that is why Gentoo has the trustees/council/devrel - to |
| 16 |
>> deal with this. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> In that light, I would like to see a dev forwarding my mail to -core. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> And a Invitee to all devs to join the discussion in -core but I hope |
| 22 |
> this was done long ago. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
You should be posting to gentoo-nfp which was the old trustees list, as |
| 25 |
well. This has nothing to do with devrel. Given there is no Foundation I'm |
| 26 |
sure the Council will be dealing with this atm in their capacity as lead |
| 27 |
devs, if nothing else. But the nfp list is for discussion about Gentoo as a |
| 28 |
not-for-profit entity. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives