1 |
> Richard Brown wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> This was the first of many nominations for the incumbent council that |
4 |
> gave no reason as to why they should be voted for in this election, as |
5 |
> several of them have accepted their nominations with no further |
6 |
> qualification, and flameeyes seems to think himself above having to |
7 |
> justify why he should be elected, so I provide, for your |
8 |
> entertainment, the following blog posts: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> A Council of Successes: An attempt to analyze what the incumbent |
11 |
> council have achieved during their tenure. |
12 |
> http://arbearohooooen.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/a-council-of-successes/ |
13 |
> |
14 |
Any blog post that calls the Council "pussies" should automatically get |
15 |
classed under "drivel" |
16 |
|
17 |
Nice. |
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |