1 |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:37:24 +0200 |
2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 26-10-2011 18:35:51 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 |
6 |
> > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the |
9 |
> > > time to raise and prepare items that the council should put on |
10 |
> > > the agenda to vote on. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require |
13 |
> > developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries |
14 |
> > and commit messages. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Ok, what's your rationale behind that? |
17 |
|
18 |
1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at |
19 |
some point, |
20 |
|
21 |
2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up |
22 |
changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message |
23 |
to see what actually happened), |
24 |
|
25 |
3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Best regards, |
29 |
Michał Górny |