Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-project@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:24:41 +0200
On 01-08-2011 23:51:16 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> A small thing which I've brought up for discussion twice (and both times
> it was mostly ignored), but which I'd really like to see discussed or
> even agreed on:
> 
> A simple policy making signed commits mandatory, plus a simple policy on
> key length, permissible encryption/signature algorithms, and a
> well-defined place where (public) keys are made available for verifying
> and checking the validity of the signatures.

That's fine, but I'm not in favour of a random open-ended discussion
between council members.  Please come with a proposal that describes the
trade-offs and has with clear voting points for the council.  Link back
to the community discussion on -dev (or -project?) and preferably sum up
the thread(s).


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level


References:
Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
-- Patrick Lauer
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
Next by thread:
Re: Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
Previous by date:
Re: Re: reopening gentoo-council
Next by date:
Re: Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09


Updated Jun 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-project mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.