List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 01-08-2011 23:51:16 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> A small thing which I've brought up for discussion twice (and both times
> it was mostly ignored), but which I'd really like to see discussed or
> even agreed on:
> A simple policy making signed commits mandatory, plus a simple policy on
> key length, permissible encryption/signature algorithms, and a
> well-defined place where (public) keys are made available for verifying
> and checking the validity of the signatures.
That's fine, but I'm not in favour of a random open-ended discussion
between council members. Please come with a proposal that describes the
trade-offs and has with clear voting points for the council. Link back
to the community discussion on -dev (or -project?) and preferably sum up
Gentoo on a different level