| 1 |
Rich Freeman schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -v is not itself a default, so if it controls the quiet output then |
| 4 |
> essentially a stock gentoo emerge command will be quiet. I'd consider |
| 5 |
> that just another variance on quiet-by-default. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If you take it like this: |
| 8 |
69% of respondents want to see build output when -v is given (52+17). |
| 9 |
28% disagree with that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
45% don't want to see build output when -v is not given (28+17). 52% |
| 12 |
disagree with that. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Among the people preferring to see build output, making -v control the |
| 15 |
default seems to be considered an acceptable compromise. So wouldn't |
| 16 |
that be great? Hiding build output by default, while still satisfying |
| 17 |
most critics of this idea. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> And no, this shouldn't |
| 20 |
> warrant having the elections team run a Condorcent vote (which should |
| 21 |
> handle issues like this). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I already stated that I would leave the call to zmedico as lead |
| 24 |
developer of portage. Giving him the arguments and the data to make the |
| 25 |
decision, but watching whether his reasoning is sound. That means |
| 26 |
clearly saying where it is based on fact and where it is based on opinion. |
| 27 |
(I wouldn't mind if he made an entirely opinion based decision, as long |
| 28 |
as he didn't claim it to be fact-based) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives