On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 12:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> That way you give the regular 1 year term to someone who
>> does his/her job, but allow to intervene directly as needed (and not
>> after 6 months).
>>
> This requires dedicated resources, meaning having people monitor the
> activity of these teams and report problems/progress. Even if we enforce
> elections every 6 months, if leaders/teams were active, it is highly
> likely to retain their positions so no harm can come out of that :).

I think that a forced re-appointment every six months is going to
create a lot more work than just keeping an eye on things.

And I don't think that anybody is proposing a very heavy level of
monitoring here.  Monitoring just means making sure that people aren't
running around with torches and pitchforks calling for the Devrel
lead's head.

Rich