1 |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Since there is no need to stay in the herd some prefixed time, I see no |
3 |
> reason to allow developers to be in mail aliases without adding them to |
4 |
> herds.xml, and this allows others to "easily" review herds.xml looking |
5 |
> for empty herds. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
From what you've said, the mail alias should just be ignored when |
9 |
reviewing herds. |
10 |
|
11 |
It is possible that the people on the alias are simply curious and |
12 |
have no intention of maintaining anything. I don't have a problem with |
13 |
that. |