| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2008.01.21 18:19, Steve Long wrote: |
| 5 |
[snip] |
| 6 |
> And when 90% say they don't like the way they |
| 7 |
> get treated by Gentoo devs, there is a real issue. Call it |
| 8 |
> communicaton, call it what you want, it's a real and valid concern. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> And IMO it holds Gentoo back. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
[snip] |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Steve, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
For the furtherance of this discussion and simplification of the |
| 17 |
problem space, lets assume that we have already identified that Gentoo |
| 18 |
is split into two mutually exclusive groups which I shall call "them" |
| 19 |
and "us". I do not admit that it is really like this but it serves as a |
| 20 |
reference frame for further discussion. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
How do you go about turning "them" and "us" into "we" ? |
| 23 |
Discuss. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
One further constraint to the discussion, you must not use the word |
| 26 |
"they", as in "they should ..." |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The idea is not to point fingers but plan how to move from the |
| 29 |
situation described above to a different (better?) situation. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
(No points for spotting the 6sigma game) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
- -- |
| 34 |
Regards, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Roy Bamford |
| 37 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 38 |
gentoo-ops |
| 39 |
forum-mods |
| 40 |
treecleaners |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
iD8DBQFHll+jTE4/y7nJvasRAqwnAJ9B+/ODtYPMaRpux809y4tBrIilGgCfa33E |
| 46 |
6VACx4CSZHjSr4ML24pUDNQ= |
| 47 |
=/bT2 |
| 48 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives