>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:

> Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how
> the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic
> mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project).
> gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda
> regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce can
> be used to draw attention to important things. How do you propose
> people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do we go
> back to the situation where threads get fragmented to multiple
> mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere than
> gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing list
> just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project /
> gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified
> numbers from infra.

gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we split
discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably more, for
example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on gentoo-pms then.)

That's too complicated for my simple mind.

Ulrich