1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hi, |
5 |
|
6 |
This is the second item I would like to discuss for the next Council |
7 |
agenda ( or a later one ) |
8 |
|
9 |
Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer |
10 |
has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
11 |
Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the |
12 |
Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote |
13 |
twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks |
14 |
a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having |
15 |
devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision, |
16 |
makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
17 |
|
18 |
Again, this is just a brainstorming, so please let me know what you think. |
19 |
|
20 |
- -- |
21 |
Regards, |
22 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
25 |
|
26 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOR62fAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC5P8P/i795gdBlM/pjD46F8yRqspF |
27 |
Bw07GWcJ7ysYRysuolqOA/MEcGn93ikCLvMvdFI/Y724GS0me+dSTT1hOrHa7KN6 |
28 |
+G6tB4f6LS+OxBCmW2r7meMufBbgizjlfQgZ9lF97N+zP3xD90XM2bsfN0GHG4qE |
29 |
SOA3YKpvHnFrBCcdo7BE4TDWGUZb0ET0EKDAPURdJ8MoR4mKEQRQHNwNENoPJ1I9 |
30 |
Vmw/bWeL+9A6qkmow2b1hua5j/LTsJ9Oevzsj1qmBf+MoyJiMtMP9qb9OMx4VSl/ |
31 |
C4MeZiz3MIIgSdKE2PV2FYTpyyqS7GBTGiCoJeYULNR8tvWyxZM3FAUfIN7ifgWy |
32 |
vu2VHwtfx3rFcS9/7p46IhA4eR6M7ZqCUe5Xu9UKBc0bSSflPDvyQbon1Zgmvu1c |
33 |
MzDF3ScVyt81vdshETWt7Zu9bxirPiLtuhTuF76YUhA7p40bqrmfImi+3ECrfeP2 |
34 |
ydC6ngCeFGQ+pl0yFnaJHhsZ6m9PvLfgrpBjvWXvRz5dpLWkrBVO1uf298AArJAt |
35 |
SyBuTooiKXo9cx2XTmn4/soyAQQIEcYJ2LWeBplT8m7OJVr7w5kamdH1Wj6rPhj7 |
36 |
nw3HfyHCNIHbGd6LdovrGug/Loys2hEYMHI4zQZXX8Tv3kzzCHKKrlJNn2Cmyc5y |
37 |
eFnARATvU5TkYfVj3RVx |
38 |
=1PSE |
39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |