Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 08/02/2011 12:12 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 01-08-2011 19:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 07:59 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 01-08-2011 18:57:43 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Theo ( tampakrap ) for reminding me, I would like to
>>>> add the gentoo/user/cloaks issue[1] to the agenda. Based on this
>>>> comment[2], it seems like we need a council vote on the matter,
>>>> so I would like to get this sorted as soon as possible.
>
>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and
>>> who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the GLEP that
>>> Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for this topic
>>> without that GLEP in place?
>
>
>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri
>> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility
>> to devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP
>> defining the devrel policy just like then one for QA.
>
> Just to be clear, one thing is having a GLEP about DevRel policy,
> another that has been mentioned before is having a GLEP about DevRel. I
> strongly disagree with the latter. For the former I prefer the current
> format of having DevRel work on a policy and have the council approve it
> or not.
>
I don't understand the difference between "DevRel policy" and "Devrel".
Which other aspects of Devrel will the second one include?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)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=Z3MY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|