List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 08/02/2011 12:12 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 01-08-2011 19:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 07:59 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 01-08-2011 18:57:43 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Theo ( tampakrap ) for reminding me, I would like to
>>>> add the gentoo/user/cloaks issue to the agenda. Based on this
>>>> comment, it seems like we need a council vote on the matter,
>>>> so I would like to get this sorted as soon as possible.
>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and
>>> who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the GLEP that
>>> Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for this topic
>>> without that GLEP in place?
>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri
>> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility
>> to devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP
>> defining the devrel policy just like then one for QA.
> Just to be clear, one thing is having a GLEP about DevRel policy,
> another that has been mentioned before is having a GLEP about DevRel. I
> strongly disagree with the latter. For the former I prefer the current
> format of having DevRel work on a policy and have the council approve it
> or not.
I don't understand the difference between "DevRel policy" and "Devrel".
Which other aspects of Devrel will the second one include?
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----