Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 22:00 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
> >> Vote on EAPI specification in/for ebuilds.
> >> <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_288fa260bf4c9242a33380fd4bfce0f8.xml>
>
> > I am sorry but this thread is huge. What is the exact question you
> > want the Council to vote on?
>
> My idea would be that we first vote if we want to address the issue.
> If this is accepted, then we would have to decide between the
> different solutions that have been proposed.
>
> We have attempted to collect all ideas here:
> <http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Alternate_EAPI_mechanisms>
>
> Ulrich
>
>
From my point of view, both decisions could be made at the same meeting:
1º Should we discuss it? -> Yes -> go to 2º // No -> end
2º Discuss alternatives
That would safe time in case you decide to address that issue and
wouldn't hurt in case you don't :)
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
