| 1 |
Holding an election and reminding other nominees that there's only 1's accepted so far does not preclude the 'no lead' option, I think you might be jumping the gun slightly NP. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Cheers, |
| 4 |
Wes |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 8 |
From: "NP-Hardass" <NP-Hardass@g.o> |
| 9 |
To: gentoo-proxy-maint@l.g.o |
| 10 |
Sent: Thursday, 14 July, 2016 3:39:16 AM |
| 11 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] Proxy Maintainers lead election: Call for nomination |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On 07/13/2016 06:26 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 14 |
> On 06/30/2016 02:04 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 15 |
>> On 06/30/2016 01:02 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 16 |
>>> This is a call for nominations to a member-initiated election |
| 17 |
>>> of a lead for the Proxy Maintainers project. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> I propose the following rules and procedure for the election |
| 20 |
>>> - Anyone can nominate a potential lead. Nomination should happen |
| 21 |
>>> by response to this email and the deadline for nominations is |
| 22 |
>>> Sunday 17th of July at 12:00 UTC |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> - Only Gentoo Developers listed as part of the project as of this |
| 25 |
>>> announcement can vote in the election. |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> - Voting is anonymous but verifiable |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>>> - The election happens using https://vote.heliosvoting.org and |
| 30 |
>>> developers eligible to vote will receive an email from the service |
| 31 |
>>> with a link to the election and a username and passphrase. |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>> - The voting starts no later than Monday 18th of July at 12:00 UTC |
| 34 |
>>> and is open until Sunday 31st of July at 12:00 UTC. |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> Additionally a nominee will have to accept participation in the election |
| 38 |
>> by a response to the proxy-maint@g.o alias |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> Reminder on nomination period expiring in a few days. So far I've |
| 42 |
> recorded only one accepted nomination |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
We've already discussed the legitimacy of the "no-lead" option and your |
| 46 |
personal opinions that we *should* have a lead are different than |
| 47 |
whether we *must* have a lead. If you opt not to include this in the |
| 48 |
election that you are facilitation, there is no point in considering |
| 49 |
this valid or binding. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives