Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: djc@g.o
Cc: gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:09
Message-Id: 4F9AD4C5.6060701@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps by Dirkjan Ochtman
On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewhat unclear. >> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset as >> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some >> re-engineering of python-wrapper. > > Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be > re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to > leave the patch out rather than include it. >
I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it and see what happens.
>>> You also removed the mention of the upstream bug from >>> 04_all_libdir.patch, probably just by mistake? >> >> I don't see any mention of a bug in the 2.7.2, 2.7.3 or 2.7.3-0 version >> of the patch, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here. > > Are you sure? The 04* patch I just unpacked from my 2.7.3 patch set > does have a bug in it (maybe it wasn't in 2.7.2, though). >
The words "bug" and "issue" do not appear in 04_all_libdir.patch from the copy of python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3.tar.bz2 that I just downloaded from distfiles.gentoo.org. I also checked the copy in distfiles-local on dev.gentoo.org. I think you may be working with a different tarball, or I'm missing something really obvious.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>