Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Cc: Sjujsckij Nikolaj <sterkrig@×××××××.com>, gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:22:07
Message-Id: 20110922112411.5843e699@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well by Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:10:13 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:

> > I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree > > keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and > > know for sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to > > recompile it and boom! half of Python modules stop working. I > > daresay these cases should be handled too. > > Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we > should probably revbump the others, too.
Don't forget to apply distutils patches for 3.* as well :P. /me hides. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature