Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: djc@g.o
Cc: gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:53:43
Message-Id: 4F9C2EA0.8000709@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps by Dirkjan Ochtman
On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:13, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: >> Would you like me to cut a new set of tarballs without 08, 22, and 23? > > That would be perfect. I'd also still like to drop 61 unless we have a > clear picture of what/why it helps (and can document that in the > patch). >
I have uploaded new tarballs to my devspace. http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3-1.tar.bz2 http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-3.2.3-1.tar.bz2 I removed only 08, 22, and 23. Per my previous message, 61 has legitimate reasons for existing. I do not believe there is a less intrusive way to accomplish what it is doing, and removing it would cause the behavior of wrapped python scripts to change. Do you still want to drop it?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>