Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: Sjujsckij Nikolaj <sterkrig@×××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:10:38
Message-Id: CAKmKYaD7N0kq=hz_FZcyi++Pb7th_ns3VE4eZN2Le5da6z+MAw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well by Sjujsckij Nikolaj
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 21:38, Sjujsckij Nikolaj <sterkrig@×××××××.com> wrote:
>  But when Linux 3.x goes stable, stable Python versions suddenly became > "broken".
Well, only versions of Python built *after* you start using the new kernel.
> I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree > keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and know for > sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to recompile it and > boom! half of Python modules stop working. I daresay these cases should be > handled too.
Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we should probably revbump the others, too. Cheers, Dirkjan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well Sjujskij Nikolaj <sterkrig@×××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-python] Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>