| 1 |
Good day all, |
| 2 |
with Python 2.4 being removed and all (anyone seen complaints about this, btw?), |
| 3 |
I'd like to discuss the removal of Python 2.5. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Although 2.5 was one of those versions that started to be useful, I really see no |
| 6 |
reason to just keep it around "just because". |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Did a quick glance in the tree and couldn't find a package that only depended |
| 9 |
on python:2.5 specifically. Please correct me if I'm wrong. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The question is therefore: why keep python 2.5 in tree? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Regards, |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Johan Bergström |
Archives