| 1 |
2012/2/20 Johan Bergström <bugs@××××××××××.nu>: |
| 2 |
> Good day all, |
| 3 |
> with Python 2.4 being removed and all (anyone seen complaints about this, btw?), |
| 4 |
> I'd like to discuss the removal of Python 2.5. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Although 2.5 was one of those versions that started to be useful, I really see no |
| 7 |
> reason to just keep it around "just because". |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Did a quick glance in the tree and couldn't find a package that only depended |
| 10 |
> on python:2.5 specifically. Please correct me if I'm wrong. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The question is therefore: why keep python 2.5 in tree? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Regards, |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Johan Bergström |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
We might be making the upgrade path for ancient systems more |
| 21 |
difficult. python-2.5 has EAPI=1 whereas python-2.6 has EAPI=2. I |
| 22 |
don't feel this is a show stopper. |
Archives