On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewhat unclear.
>> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset as
>> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some
>> re-engineering of python-wrapper.
> 
> Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be
> re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to
> leave the patch out rather than include it.
> 

I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully
understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it and
see what happens.

>>> You also removed the mention of the upstream bug from
>>> 04_all_libdir.patch, probably just by mistake?
>>
>> I don't see any mention of a bug in the 2.7.2, 2.7.3 or 2.7.3-0 version
>> of the patch, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here.
> 
> Are you sure? The 04* patch I just unpacked from my 2.7.3 patch set
> does have a bug in it (maybe it wasn't in 2.7.2, though).
>

The words "bug" and "issue" do not appear in 04_all_libdir.patch from
the copy of python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3.tar.bz2 that I just downloaded
from distfiles.gentoo.org. I also checked the copy in distfiles-local on
dev.gentoo.org.

I think you may be working with a different tarball, or I'm missing
something really obvious.