1 |
On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
2 |
>>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewhat unclear. |
3 |
>> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset as |
4 |
>> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some |
5 |
>> re-engineering of python-wrapper. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be |
8 |
> re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to |
9 |
> leave the patch out rather than include it. |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully |
13 |
understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it and |
14 |
see what happens. |
15 |
|
16 |
>>> You also removed the mention of the upstream bug from |
17 |
>>> 04_all_libdir.patch, probably just by mistake? |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> I don't see any mention of a bug in the 2.7.2, 2.7.3 or 2.7.3-0 version |
20 |
>> of the patch, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Are you sure? The 04* patch I just unpacked from my 2.7.3 patch set |
23 |
> does have a bug in it (maybe it wasn't in 2.7.2, though). |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
The words "bug" and "issue" do not appear in 04_all_libdir.patch from |
27 |
the copy of python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3.tar.bz2 that I just downloaded |
28 |
from distfiles.gentoo.org. I also checked the copy in distfiles-local on |
29 |
dev.gentoo.org. |
30 |
|
31 |
I think you may be working with a different tarball, or I'm missing |
32 |
something really obvious. |