Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:10:13 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> > I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree
> > keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and
> > know for sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to
> > recompile it and boom! half of Python modules stop working. I
> > daresay these cases should be handled too.
>
> Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we
> should probably revbump the others, too.
Don't forget to apply distutils patches for 3.* as well :P.
/me hides.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
|
|
