Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-python
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-python: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
From: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:24:11 +0200
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:10:13 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:

> > I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree
> > keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and
> > know for sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to
> > recompile it and boom! half of Python modules stop working. I
> > daresay these cases should be handled too.
> 
> Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we
> should probably revbump the others, too.

Don't forget to apply distutils patches for 3.* as well :P.

/me hides.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
-- Matthew Summers
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
-- Sjujsckij Nikolaj
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-python: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Next by thread:
Leaving 2.4 behind
Previous by date:
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Next by date:
Leaving 2.4 behind


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-python mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.