Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:13, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
>> Would you like me to cut a new set of tarballs without 08, 22, and 23?
>
> That would be perfect. I'd also still like to drop 61 unless we have a
> clear picture of what/why it helps (and can document that in the
> patch).
>
I have uploaded new tarballs to my devspace.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3-1.tar.bz2
http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-3.2.3-1.tar.bz2
I removed only 08, 22, and 23.
Per my previous message, 61 has legitimate reasons for existing. I do
not believe there is a less intrusive way to accomplish what it is
doing, and removing it would cause the behavior of wrapped python
scripts to change. Do you still want to drop it?
|
|
