Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-python] Do we need another 'new' python eclass besides python-distutils-ng?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 17:45:47
Message-Id: 20120527194640.15bf617a@pomiocik.lan
1 Hello,
2
3 So noone feels omitted, the first question with 'new' Python eclasses -
4 does 'just' python-distutils-ng suit us, or do we need to split out
5 a more basic eclass of some sort?
6
7 My opinion here: python-distutils-ng itself could be fine, because:
8
9 1) packages which don't support multiple Python ABIs probably don't
10 need anything like our USEflags or other stuff that -ng provides --
11 they're as good with the old python.eclass;
12
13 2) packages which use distutils are fine with p-d-ng;
14
15 3) packages which are built for multiple Python ABIs yet do not use
16 distutils need to declare python_compile() and stuff anyway. And if we
17 do, then p-d-ng is basically python-ng.
18
19 What're your thoughts?
20
21 --
22 Best regards,
23 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature