1 |
On 05/12/2012 01:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 12 May 2012 12:04:36 +0200 |
3 |
> Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 12/05/12 11:19, Nikolaj Sjujskij wrote: |
6 |
>>> Den 2012-02-29 01:13:36 skrev Krzysztof Pawlik |
7 |
>>> <nelchael@g.o>: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> Hello, |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> After some work during weekend on Python packages I've decided to |
12 |
>>>> start a rewrite of Python/distutils eclass for installing Python |
13 |
>>>> packages. ... |
14 |
>>>> Highlights: |
15 |
>>>> ... |
16 |
>>>> - uses PYTHON_TARGETS use-expand (no more python-updater, whoooo!) |
17 |
>>> Hm... Does it require users to maintain correct PYTHON_TARGETS in |
18 |
>>> make.conf? No default/fallback value? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> No, I'm a *HUGE* fan of free choice -- I don't know which Python |
21 |
>> version you want, so select the correct one yourself. It's a one-time |
22 |
>> choice anyway. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> It's not a one-time choice. It's rather a new choice every time a new |
25 |
> major version is introduced, and all users who don't care have to |
26 |
> update the var to keep it up-to-date. Not that I care much, just |
27 |
> pointing out. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Why not emulate php/ruby and set a default value in the base profile? |
31 |
See profiles/base/make.defaults. |
32 |
|
33 |
I think PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2" would be a reasonable choice. |