1 |
2012/2/20 Johan Bergström <bugs@××××××××××.nu>: |
2 |
> Good day all, |
3 |
> with Python 2.4 being removed and all (anyone seen complaints about this, btw?), |
4 |
> I'd like to discuss the removal of Python 2.5. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Although 2.5 was one of those versions that started to be useful, I really see no |
7 |
> reason to just keep it around "just because". |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Did a quick glance in the tree and couldn't find a package that only depended |
10 |
> on python:2.5 specifically. Please correct me if I'm wrong. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The question is therefore: why keep python 2.5 in tree? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Regards, |
15 |
> -- |
16 |
> Johan Bergström |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
We might be making the upgrade path for ancient systems more |
21 |
difficult. python-2.5 has EAPI=1 whereas python-2.6 has EAPI=2. I |
22 |
don't feel this is a show stopper. |