Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-python
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-python: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-python@g.o
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Subject: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:14:48 +0200
I think it would be good to take the upstream patch and apply it to
our packages. We might even do this for all the old versions. However,
in the simple case that would mean revbumping 6 slots and requesting
restabilization, for something excessively tiny (which doesn't cause
issues for any Python built while running a pre-3.0 kernel). Is there
a way we can slip this in without revbumping for older versions,
keeping the stable keywords? Should we consult gentoo-dev about it?

Cheers,

Dirkjan


Replies:
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
-- Matthew Summers
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-python: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Next by thread:
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well
Next by date:
Re: Bug 375257: python and >=linux-3 don't play well


Updated May 26, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-python mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.