Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 13:14:19
Message-Id: 4DD7BA97.2010404@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 21/05/2011 02:03 μμ, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: >> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't >> control >> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and >> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. > > Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members > not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. > > But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. >
First of all, please calm down both of you. Second, who is eligible to vote? Do you really think that QA has 14[1] active or semi-active members who are capable to evaluate the circumstances and vote as appropriate? [1]http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/ - -- Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJN17qXAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCdN8P/1xjraBk8cf2/k+Qk+PQsZt1 NYepZLQ3yvseg+zGll0ViF6xYZomT/Sd2Nf+w5YltlDRFIx+C0NpG4bZsktnSShp gSekhuCxn3K5D86NA6kgh0fvSI3ZzPytQONYquDPjSEwa/7za15zkajfprzhcmOS LM5mxN3TalRi52aJpkSSkksJbZ3TQbUVrzvSjlMDpWvXa77Ks5RrZ5fIwRcpJbrX EcW7iFaCdS1SWTPXVmGRC+41Q2b4yG326J2pMfepDJcfTAs/BEQomn70l5mYXrkB Djev1BPd743qKzfI8f5Ms5wVcgkeiZ8KUnD7ZMgHJVBeirTkri8TfQsNCddW0JrP b7wO38U/eSgY5S7PurbN7aQt0zHRPvjmdJS/DNkQqoGslJ/F9L7bQP55OfH4pHnv M7/1f4vW4AOAcdaChnxSQ9GnqYwSCRxvOkiNSLOQMYfADsRHjQV0L3khJ1Ks/4VB 3Q3S7zoNnUPWkI5JuCu2M3ISjHNmeDBufTTafDFb4DnRSXVVdBFhIq+1A8nm3hEC umbVoH5tZP5N8ZY9nx/4dVoIhr3pRlHy6v6VvCD7m0K6dwWLzp9/UEg3O1yGhspH V8SzIG4EXIywhxNMR91jt+xefxNnBfPFWVMRaamnbH4Bwf3H6yC1yW8aH7IIWaM2 VYNh/LJIMouz8BZMuGNk =J43k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----