1 |
Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 16.57 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò ha |
2 |
scritto: |
3 |
> In particular, he failed to even notify the rest of |
4 |
> the team about important developments in a QA-critical devrel case, |
5 |
> the |
6 |
> resolution of which, from the current outlook, will cause further |
7 |
> workload on the (already strained) QA team. |
8 |
|
9 |
Actually, at the current point in time (with developments that once |
10 |
again cannot be made public — thus why I would have preferred for this |
11 |
discussion not to be in public right away, but alas), I'll have to |
12 |
retire my objection here. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'd still like to see for a different action for what concerns QA |
15 |
though, and also more involvement from the rest of the team members. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
19 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
20 |
|
21 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
22 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |