| 1 |
On 04/22/2010 01:33 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> I have this idea of what areas we as QA should work: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [treecleaners] |
| 5 |
> Guys responsible for maintaining profiles and removing packages that |
| 6 |
> in long-term fails to meet up QA standards. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
treecleaners is mostly for maintainer-needed@ packages, and for bugs |
| 9 |
where maintainer has ACK'd the removal (or there has been a general |
| 10 |
consensus the package is no good). so that's the ebuild aspect. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
profiles in other hand have been responsibility of the release@ team, |
| 13 |
but since that hasn't lately been really the case... qa@ has been taking |
| 14 |
care of it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
my point being: what does treecleaners have to do with profiles? |
Archives