| 1 |
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 4 |
> <snip> |
| 5 |
>>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; |
| 6 |
>>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the |
| 7 |
>>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. |
| 8 |
>>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd |
| 9 |
>>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at |
| 10 |
>>> finding me magically added. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it |
| 13 |
> rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me |
| 14 |
> under the guise of following procedure? |
| 15 |
> If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to |
| 16 |
> you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this |
| 17 |
> puerile (something)ery. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing |
| 22 |
X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end |
| 23 |
up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list |
Archives