Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:07:30
Message-Id: 44FE1F87.6080704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) by Christel Dahlskjaer
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > <snip> >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at >>> finding me magically added. > > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me > under the guise of following procedure? > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this > puerile (something)ery. > >
I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place. -- gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@g.o>